References

Aguilar Delgado, N. (2016) Community protocols as tools for resisting exclusion in global environmental governance, RAE, 56(4): 395-410.

Anaya, J. (2004) Indigenous Peoples in International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

ANDES (Peru) (2012), The Potato Park Communities and IIED, Community Biocultural Protocols Building Mechanisms for Access and Benefit Sharing among the Communities of the Potato Park based on Quechua Customary Norms, Detailed Case Study.

Argumedo, A. (2012), Decolonising action-research: The Potato Park biocultural protocol for benefit-sharing, in K. Swiderska et al. (ed.) PLA65: Biodiversity and culture: exploring community protocols, rights and consent, London: iied.

Argumedo, A. and Hall, I. (forthcoming) The potato park of Pisac. Building tools to strengthen the local life project, the Sumaq kawsay, in C. Scott et al., Indigenous Stewardship of Environment And Alternative Development, Toronto: University of Toronto press.

Atlani-Duault, L. (2005) Au bonheur des autres: anthropologie de l'aide humanitaire, Nanterre: Société d’ethnologie.

Barié, C.G. (2014) Nuevas narrativas constitucionales en Bolivia y Ecuador: el buen vivir y los derechos de la naturaleza, Latinoamérica. Revista de Estudios Latinoamericanos, 59: 9-40.

Bavikatte, K. and Jonas, H. (2009) A Bio-cultural Critique of the CBD and ABS, in Natural Justice (ed.), Bio-Cultural Community Protocols. A Community Approach to Ensuring the Integrity of Environmental Law and Policy, Cape Town: United Nations Environment Programme, Natural Justice.

Bavikatte, K.S. and Robinson, D.F. (2011) Towards a People's History of the Law: Biocultural Jurisprudence and the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing, Law, Environment and Development Journal, 7(1): 35-51.

Bavikatte, K.S. (2014) Stewarding the earth: rethinking property and the emergence of biocultural rights, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

BMZ - Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (2012) Possibilities and Limitations for a Biocultural Protocol(s), Eschborn, Bonn: GIZ.

Callicott, J.B. (1995) Intrinsic Value in Nature: A Metaethical Analysis, Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy 3(5). Available at: http:/ejap.louisiana.edu/ejap/1995.spring/callicott.1995.spring.html.

Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y. (2001) Acting in an Uncertain World, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2009.

CBD (2016) Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Mo'otz Kuxtal guidelines, CBD/COP/DEC/XIII/18.

Coomes, O.T. et al. (2015) Farmer seed networks make limited contribution to agriculture? Four common misconceptions, Food Policy, 56: 41-50.

Descola, Ph. (1986) La nature domestique : Symbolisme and Praxis dans l'écologie des Achuar, Paris: Les Editions de la MSH, Paris, 1986.

Dupret, B. (2006) Droit et sciences sociales, Paris: Armand Colin.

Filoche, G. (2011) Formaliser l'informel, capter l'evanescent ? in C. Gros and D. Dumoulin Kervran (ed.) Le multiculturalisme ‘au concret’. Un modèle latino-américain ?, Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle.

Filoche, G. (forthcoming) V° Droits bioculturels, in Dictionnaire juridique des transitions écologiques.

Fitzpatrick, E.F.M. et al. (2016) Seeking consent for research with indigenous communities: a systematic review, BMC Med Ethics, 17(1): 65.

Girard, F. and Frison, C. (eds) (2018) The Commons, Plant Breeding and Agricultural Research. Challenges for food security and agrobiodiversity, Oxon: Routledge.

Graeub, B.E. et al. (2016) The State of Family Farms in the World, World Development, 87: 1-15.

Gutwirth, S. et Stengers, I. (2016) Le droit à l’épreuve de la résurgence des commons, Revue juridique de l'environnement, 2(41): 306-343

Hall, I. (forthcoming) Le Parc de la pomme de terre, conservation in-situ et valorisation des savoirs locaux (Cusco, Pérou), in F. Verdeaux, I. Hall, B. Moizo (eds), Les savoirs locaux, l'innovation permanente, Montreal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal.

Howitt, R. (2001) Frontiers, Borders, Edges: Liminal Challenges to the Hegemony of Exclusion, Australian Geographical Studies, 39(2): 233-45.

Jonas, H., Makagon, J.E. and Shrumm, H. (2013) The Living Convention, Cape Town: Natural Justice.

Marcus, G.E. (1995) Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24: 95-117.

Laugrand, F. (forthcoming) L’écriture protéiforme des ateliers de transmission intergénérationnelle des savoirs et les vertus de ‘faire comme si’, in B. Charlier et al., Les écritures des terrains anthropologiques, Louvain.

Maris, V. (2010) Philosophie de la biodiversité: petite éthique pour une nature en péril, Paris: Buchet Chastel, 2016.

McGuire, S. and Sperling, L. (2016) Seed Systems Smallholder Farmers Use, Food Security, 8(1): 179-95.

Morgera, E., Tsioumani, E. and Buck, M. (2015) Unraveling the Nagoya Protocol. A Commentary on the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Leiden, Boston: Brill

Natural Justice (ed.) (2012), Biocultural Community Protocols: A toolkit for community facilitators, Cape Town: Natural Justice.

Nilayangode, P. et alii(2017) Grassroots Initiatives for Environmental Sustainability, in Laladhas, K.P., Nilayangod, P., Oommen, V. (ed.) Biodiversity for Sustainable Development, Switzerland : Springer.

Posey, D.A. (ed.) (1999) Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity, London : Intermediate Technology.

Posey, D.A. (ed.) (1996) Traditional Resource Rights: International Instruments for Protection and Compensation for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, Traditional Resource Rights: International Instruments for Protection and Compensation for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, Gland; Cambridge : IUCN - The World Conservation Union;

Posey, D.A. and Dutfield G., (1996) Beyond Intellectual Property: Toward Traditional Resource Rights for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, Ottawa : International Development Research Centre.

Sajeva, G. (2015a) Rights with limits: biocultural rights – between self-determination and conservation of the environment, Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 6(1): 30-54.

Sajeva, G. (2015b) When Rights Embrace Responsibilities Biocultural Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, Ph.-D thesis: Università Degli Studi di Palermo.

Salazar, R., Louwaars, N. and Visser, B. (2007) Protecting Farmers’ New Varieties: New Approaches to Rights on Collective Innovations in Plant Genetic Resources, World Development, 35(9): 1515-28.

Salter, M. and von Braun J. (2011) Biocultural Community Protocols : Bridging the Gap Between Customary, National and International Law, Effectius Newsletter, Issue 14.

Sandvik, B. and Suikkari, S. (1997) Harm and Reparation in International Treaty Regimes: An Overview, in Wetterstein, J. (ed.) Harm to the Environment: The Right to Compensation and the Assessment of Damages, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Santilli, J. (2016) Agrobiodiversity and the Law. Regulating genetic resources, food, security and cultural diversity, Oxon, New York: Routledge.

Shils, E.A., Finch, H.A. (1949) Max Weber in the Methodology of the Social Sciences, Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press

Sibuye, R., Uys, M.-T., Cocchiaro, H., and Lorenzen, J. (2012) The Bushbuckridge BCP: Traditional healers organise for ABS in South Africa, in K. Swiderska et al. (ed.) PLA65: Biodiversity and culture: exploring community protocols, rights and consent, London: iied.

Srinivasan, C.S. (2016) Institutional capacity and implementation issues in farmers' rights, M. Halewood (ed.), Farmers' Crop Varieties and Farmers' Rights. Challenges in taxonomy and law, London, New York: Routledge.

Strathern, M. (1999) Property, substance and effect: anthropological essays on persons and things, London: Athlone.

Tobin, B. and Taylor, E. (2009)‘Across the Great Divide: A case study of complementarity and conflict between customary law and TK protection legislation in Peru’, INITIATIVE for the PREVENTION of BIOPIRACY, Research Documents, Year IV No. 11 May 2009.

Tobin, B. (2014) Indigenous peoples, customary law and human rights:  why living law matters, Oxon: Routledge.

United Nations Univ. & Inst. of Advanced Studies (2004) The Role of Registers and Databases in the Protection of Traditional Knowledge (Report Jan. 2004), available at: http://www.ias.unu.edu/binaries/UNUIAS_TKRegistersReport.pdf

Van Campenhoudt L., Chaumont J.-M., Franssen A. (2005) La méthode d'analyse en groupe. Application aux phénomènes sociaux, Paris: Dunod.

Von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K. and Spiertz, J. (1998), Equidad y pluralismo legal : la consideración del derecho consuetudinario en las políticas sobre recursos naturales, in B. Rutgerd and D. Gloria, (eds), Buscando la equidad. Concepciones sobre justicia y equidad en el riego campesino, Assen: Van Gorcum Publishers.

Viveiros de Castro, E. (1998) Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3): 469.

Weixia Chen, C. and Gilmore, M. (2015) Biocultural Rights: A New Paradigm for Protecting Natural and Cultural Resources of Indigenous Communities, The International Indigenous Policy Journal, (6):3.

Wood, M.C. et al. (2008a) Tribes as Trustees Again (Part 1): The Emerging Tribal Role in the Conservation Trust Movement, Harvard Environmental Law Review, 32: 373-432;

Wood, M.C. et al. (2008b) Tribes as Trustees Again (Part 2): Evaluating Four Models of Tribal Participation in the Conservation Trust Movement, Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 27: 477-546.